[Advisory] Re: [Secondary] UK Consultation on Copyright and Education

Leon Cych dfee@btinternet.com
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:58:54 +0000 (GMT)


--0-906369409-1265803134=:53035
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

As Theo says - this is very important and the time to act is now - if peopl=
e can spare the time to add comments to the relevant paras I will cut and p=
aste the responses referencing the paras and comments.

It really is urgent.

Leon Cych

--- On Wed, 10/2/10, theo kuechel <theo.kuechel@googlemail.com> wrote:

From: theo kuechel <theo.kuechel@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [Secondary] UK Consultation on Copyright and Education
To: "Paul Springford" <paul.springford@naace.org>
Cc: beyond@talk.naace.org, primary@talk.naace.org, secondary@talk.naace.org=
, "Advisory talk" <advisory@talk.naace.org>
Date: Wednesday, 10 February, 2010, 11:15

Paul, Colleagues;

This is very timely, urgent and probably of greater significance than the m=
any technologies we often discuss, (including=A0 iPads, Interactive whitebo=
ards, Web 2.0 applications or VLEs); the outcomes of this consultation are =
likely to determine how we are allowed to use our digital tools, access dig=
ital content and by default, determine the opportunities we afford our lear=
ners. These outcomes will shape the future culture of learning for the fore=
seeable future and permeate all=0Aeducational uses of ICT including distanc=
e learning, mobile=0Atechnologies, student work in digital format and the s=
haring and development of teacher=0Acreated resources.
=0A=0A
Having read Marshall's synopsis and then the re-read the documents it appea=
rs there is some urgent work to be done. Leon Cych has created a copy of Go=
wer's recommendations for educational exceptions here, to which we can add =
comments /annotations. Please email Leon for access.
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
It=A0 think is important we have that debate and I personally look forward =
to reading the Nacce community views, and hopefully. as you suggest, we can=
 start to develop a Naace response. I am surprised there is no Naace workin=
g group on this?
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
Best
=0A=0ATheo
=0A



On 5 February 2010 21:38, Paul Springford <paul.springford@naace.org> wrote=
:
=0A=0A=0A=0AColleagues

Many of you will already have read in the latest Naace newsletter Marshal M=
ateer's article about an important consultation with implications for UK sc=
hools. Did you already know about the Intellectual Property Office (IPO), "=
the official government body responsible for granting Intellectual =0APrope=
rty (IP) rights in the United Kingdom"? Possibly not. It's their consultati=
on and it deals in part with copyright in education in a digital age.

We firmly expect that members will wish to discuss the implications for our=
 schools and colleges here on Naacetalk. We are=0Alooking for a volunteer t=
o coordinate the discussion and use it as the=0Abasis of a Naace response t=
o the IPO. Any offers please to paul.springford@naace.co.uk
=0A


--=20
Theo Kuechel
Learning Technology Research =A0
theo.kuechel@gmail.com
T.Kuechel@hull.ac.uk
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A

=0A
--0-906369409-1265803134=:53035
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;">As Theo says - this is very important and the=
 time to act is now - if people can spare the time to add comments to the r=
elevant paras I will cut and paste the responses referencing the paras and =
comments.<br><br>It really is urgent.<br><br>Leon Cych<br><br>--- On <b>Wed=
, 10/2/10, theo kuechel <i>&lt;theo.kuechel@googlemail.com&gt;</i></b> wrot=
e:<br><blockquote style=3D"border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-=
left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: theo kuechel &lt;theo.kuechel@goog=
lemail.com&gt;<br>Subject: Re: [Secondary] UK Consultation on Copyright and=
 Education<br>To: "Paul Springford" &lt;paul.springford@naace.org&gt;<br>Cc=
: beyond@talk.naace.org, primary@talk.naace.org, secondary@talk.naace.org, =
"Advisory talk" &lt;advisory@talk.naace.org&gt;<br>Date: Wednesday, 10 Febr=
uary, 2010, 11:15<br><br><div id=3D"yiv284478576">Paul, Colleagues;<br><br>=
This is
 very timely, urgent and probably of greater significance than the many tec=
hnologies we often discuss, (including&nbsp; iPads, Interactive whiteboards=
, Web 2.0 applications or VLEs); the outcomes of this consultation are like=
ly to determine how we are allowed to use our digital tools, access digital=
 content and by default, determine the opportunities we afford our learners=
. These outcomes will shape the future culture of learning for the foreseea=
ble future and permeate all=0Aeducational uses of ICT including distance le=
arning, mobile=0Atechnologies, student work in digital format and the shari=
ng and development of teacher=0Acreated resources.<br>=0A=0A<br>Having read=
 Marshall's synopsis and then the re-read the documents it appears there is=
 some urgent work to be done. Leon Cych has created a copy of Gower's recom=
mendations for educational exceptions <a rel=3D"nofollow" target=3D"_blank"=
 href=3D"http://is.gd/84oFi">here</a>, to which we can add comments /annota=
tions. Please email <a rel=3D"nofollow" ymailto=3D"mailto:leoncych@gmail.co=
m" target=3D"_blank" href=3D"/mc/compose?to=3Dleoncych@gmail.com">Leon</a> =
for access.<br>=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A<br>It&nbsp; think is important we have th=
at debate and I personally look forward to reading the Nacce community view=
s, and hopefully. as you suggest, we can start to develop a Naace response.=
 I am surprised there is no Naace working group on this?<br>=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=
=0A<br>Best<br>=0A=0ATheo<br>=0A<br><br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
On 5 February 2010 21:38, Paul Springford <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a rel=3D"n=
ofollow" ymailto=3D"mailto:paul.springford@naace.org" target=3D"_blank" hre=
f=3D"/mc/compose?to=3Dpaul.springford@naace.org">paul.springford@naace.org<=
/a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>=0A=0A=0A=0A<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; =
padding-left: 1ex;">Colleagues<br><br>Many of you will already have read in=
 the latest Naace newsletter Marshal Mateer's article about an important co=
nsultation with implications for UK schools. Did you already know about the=
 Intellectual Property Office (IPO), "the <b>official government body</b> r=
esponsible for granting Intellectual =0AProperty (IP) rights in the United =
Kingdom"? Possibly not. It's their consultation and it deals in part with c=
opyright in education in a digital age.<br><br>We firmly expect that member=
s will wish to discuss the implications for our schools and colleges here o=
n Naacetalk. We are=0Alooking for a volunteer to coordinate the discussion =
and use it as the=0Abasis of a Naace response to the IPO. Any offers please=
 to <a rel=3D"nofollow" ymailto=3D"mailto:paul.springford@naace.co.uk" targ=
et=3D"_blank" href=3D"/mc/compose?to=3Dpaul.springford@naace.co.uk">paul.sp=
ringford@naace.co.uk</a><br>=0A</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br=
>-- <br>Theo Kuechel<br>Learning Technology Research &nbsp;<br><a rel=3D"no=
follow" ymailto=3D"mailto:theo.kuechel@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank" href=3D=
"/mc/compose?to=3Dtheo.kuechel@gmail.com">theo.kuechel@gmail.com</a><br><a =
rel=3D"nofollow" ymailto=3D"mailto:T.Kuechel@hull.ac.uk" target=3D"_blank" =
href=3D"/mc/compose?to=3DT.Kuechel@hull.ac.uk">T.Kuechel@hull.ac.uk</a><br>=
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A<br><br>=0A</div></blockquote></td><=
/tr></table>
--0-906369409-1265803134=:53035--